Psikopat Pinpin yang dungu kayak anjing dan sudah keleleran itu sekarang pamer otaknya yang sudah jadi busuk, nista lagi menjijikan dikacau ajaran agama najis Islam yana dianutnya dengan main fitnah...
--- In [email protected], "pinpinyuliansyah" <pinpinyuliansyah@...> wrote: > > yang tidak ada gunanya dan ngabisin duit itu bukan serdadu plik ... > tapi manusia kayak uplik ... > kerjaan cuman internetan. > hidup dari jaminan sosial. > > sok ... guna nya uplik apa coba ? > > Jangankan untuk dunia atau negara. > Bahkan bagi "orang rumah" aja apan uplikmah cuman jadi beban doang. > > okeh ? > > --- In [email protected], Bukan Pedanda <bukan.pedanda@> wrote: > > > > Di era global village ini perselisihan antara negara sungguh tidak perlu > > diselesaikan dengan senjata lagi.. > > > > Dan serdadu itu sungguh tidakada gunanya lagi. > > > > Bikin susah aja dan ngabisin duit. > > > > --- > > > > China and India's smoldering problem > > By Jonathan Levine, Special for CNN > > May 20, 2013 -- Updated 1315 GMT (2115 HKT) > > Chinese premier goes to India > > STORY HIGHLIGHTS > > * Chinese premier makes first foreign trip since taking role to India > > * Visit comes weeks after Chinese troops crossed the border into India > > * Two countries have been involved in a land dispute for more than a > > century > > * Analyst says there's no appetite for a fight between the two most > > populous nations > > Editor's note: Jonathan Levine is a freelance journalist and contributing > > analyst at the geostrategic > > consulting firm Wikistrat. He is a frequent China commentator for > > leading international news sites and also works as a lecturer of > > American Studies at Tsinghua University in Beijing. You can follow him > > on Twitter > > @LevineJonathan. > > Beijing (CNN) -- Chinese Premier Li Keqiang is in > > India on his first foreign trip since assuming the post and has begun > > diplomatic talks at a delicate time for the world's two most populous > > nations. > > Just weeks ago, the world witnessed the latest chapter in one of Asia's > > least understood disputes when soldiers from China's People's Liberation > > Army crossed the border > > and set up an encampment in the mountains at the edge of the Indian > > region of Ladakh. > > The troops have since > > withdrawn, but the incident served as a stark reminder of the smoldering > > problem that still bedevils the Asian behemoths. > > The origins of the > > struggle for this charged corner of the world lies in the realpolitik > > and imperialism of the 19th and 20th centuries. > > > > Jonathan Levine > > According to a report by > > the U.S. Marine Corps Command and Staff College, the British, installed > > in their Indian colony, attempted to demarcate their holdings with the > > "Johnson Line." > > CNN iReport: Indians protest China's incursion > > Drawn by the surveyor, > > William Johnson in 1864, it claimed the area known as Aksai Chin as part of > > India's Ladakh territory. The British later repudiated the line and, in > > 1899, replaced it with the Macartney-MacDonald line. The new line > > moved Aksai Chin back to China. > > Disputed islands buzzing with activity > > Huntsman: China, U.S. interests aligned > > Richardson: China could fix Korea crisis > > After World War I, the > > British reversed themselves again, placing Aksai Chin back in India, but > > never made any effort to exert formal authority. In 1947, newly > > independent India drew their border to reflect the more generous Johnson > > Line even though they had not exerted an iota of control over Aksai > > Chin for almost half a century. > > The Ladakh incursion puts a wrinkle on what seemed to be a burgeoning era > > of Sino-Indian > > bonhomie. In recent years, both nations have bent over backwards to > > demonstrate their mutual good will. > > Bilateral trade is > > expected to hit $100 billion by 2015, joint military exercises were held > > last year (after previously being suspended) and both sides had agreed > > to respect a more favorable boundary for China known as the "Line of > > Actual Control." > > READ: Does upsetting China matter? > > But China's recent advance beyond the de facto border is hardly without > > precedent. > > According to The Times > > of India, China has violated the LAC more than 500 times since 2010. > > Though experts have described many of these transgressions as "routine," > > and regular military contact exists between the two governments, any > > "mistake" that were to occur by the Chinese army on Indian soil could be > > volatile. Particularly in China, journalist-stoked jingoism can turn > > even the most banal activity into an absurd ballet of face-saving. > > Far-fetched? In 2002, > > American soldiers in South Korea accidentally ran over and killed two > > 14-year-old girls. The Yangju Highway Incident, as it became known, > > sparked a fury of anti-American protests and severely tested the > > U.S.-Korea relationship -- and America was there legally. How would > > India and China resolve a similar incident? > > READ: Why America and China can't trust each other > > "Mistakes can be made," > > said Anil Gupta, professor of strategy & globalization, at the > > University of Maryland at College Park and co-founder of the China-India > > Institute. "However, I do not believe that either China or India is > > looking for a fight." Gupta stressed that China's latest incursion > > should be seen in a regional context as a test of "muscle-flexing" and > > that its actions were not indicative of any real desire to acquire new > > territory. > > Muscle-flexing or not, > > what is certain is that in recent years China has become a very bad > > neighbor. Their Indian claims extend over a 6,530-kilometer (4,057-mile) > > border, which includes a sizeable chunk of the Indian state of > > Arunachal Pradesh and large swaths of Bhutan. In the last year the world > > saw the strident revival of China's long dormant claim to the > > Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands, as well as a string of others extending as far > > south as the James Shoal, a mere 80 kilometers (50 miles) from the > > Malaysian coast. > > Mistakes can be made. However, I do not believe that either China or India > > is looking for a fight > > Anil Gupta, China-India Institute > > While the risk of > > conflict between China and India will always remain until a final > > resolution is reached, going forward, there are reasons to believe that > > the two sides will be able to continue on a relatively peaceful track. > > China's relationship > > with India is far more benign than its one with their other regional > > antagonist, Japan. The 1962 Sino-Indian war, fought for this very > > territory, is all but forgotten among Chinese citizens, while memories > > of Japanese hostilities during World War II are as raw as ever. As the > > Sinologist Susan Shirk reported in her book: "China: Fragile > > Superpower," China's relationship with Japan is highly sensitive and > > thus subject to the counterproductive impulses of popular nationalism. > > By contrast, China's relations with India stir no such emotions and are > > handled out of the spotlight with greater room to maneuver. > > Economics too will > > likely promote cooler heads. As Gupta noted, India's importance to China > > will only increase as India's economy grows. As a market for exports > > and investments, he predicted that India would become an invaluable > > partner. "I see the next five years as high risk," said Gupta. "Then I > > think we can all be a lot more relaxed." > > Unfortunately, it > > remains a truism that facts on the ground often move faster than > > governments' ability to respond to them. In the absence of a resolution, > > the world can only hope that India and China succeed in kicking their > > differences down the road indefinitely, because if their dispute ever > > does come to a head, the consequences could be catastrophic. > > Follow us on Twitter @CNNOpinion. > > Join us on Facebook/CNNOpinion. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > ------------------------------------ Post message: [email protected] Subscribe : [email protected] Unsubscribe : [email protected] List owner : [email protected] Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
