Mangkanya melek.. goblok! Yg dipikirin jangan cuman gimana bikin
kerusuhan!
Ernst Zundel's trial resumes on February 9. Believe it or not, we now
have 6 (!) attorneys on our team - three of our own, and three the
German government insists should be added. These German-government
paid attorneys will eventually also be paid by us in case of a
conviction, which Ernst believes is a foregone conclusion since no
meaningful defense is possible. As you have seen in the opening
spectacle in November, even attorneys who haven't even had a chance to
submit proof of Revisionist findings are already suspected of "being
too close" to the defendant and in danger of losing their licence!
That's Germany for you today - as many see it today, a colony of Zion,
submissively doing its bidding.
Why, then, keep struggling on, you ask?
For the same reason that previous Holocaust trials were fought - to
use the courts as a megaphone to get the information to the people.
Even with a beholden press, enough of the substance of these Holocaust
show trials is sickering out - and more and more people are being
informed. These days, even presidents of large, important countries
are now speaking out and asking to have the Holocaust claims
investigated and verified.
The most promising development, of course, is the announced Iranian
Revisionist conference.
Also, for newcomers, here is a quick summary why the so-called
"Holocaust" is of such paramount importance to the powers that be, and
why one sees the extraordinary measures taken by predominant Western
states to suppress any skepticism:
The Jewish Holocaust is one of the few remaining taboos of western
society, on par with incest and paedophilia. Most people will react
with very strong feelings ranging from anger to fear, shock and
disgust, when exposed to any perceived threat to beliefs relating to
the Holocaust. Even discussing its taboo nature causes considerable
levels of discomfort. Unbeknown to most people, its continued
existence serves a number of powerful interests and comes at a
terrible cost to society.
The taboo quality of the Jewish Holocaust in Western society is being
enforced no differently from taboos in Polynesia: failure to comply
results in social and economic ruin, incarceration, physical attack,
sometimes even loss of life. Believing that the Jewish Holocaust as we
know it - as the systematic, bureaucratic, state-sponsored persecution
and murder of approximately six million Jews by the Nazi regime and
its collaborators through the use of gas and other methods - actually
occurred, determines whether a person is considered a Nazi and
Anti-Semite (in other words utterly evil and a danger to society) or not.
A political/historical taboo like this wouldn't exist if it didn't
serve very powerful interests. The most obvious is support for Israel.
Reports of the murder of six million Jews understandably generated
considerable sympathy and support for the idea of the foundation of a
Jewish state in Palestine and still helps deflecting criticism of
Israel's treatment of the Palestine people and its neighbours. Less
obvious is the interest of the political left in gaining moral
superiority over the political right. And last, but not least, there
is the interest of the Allied powers, especially the US and the UK, of
justifying their war crimes committed against the German people during
World War II. Who worries about the deliberate destruction of 90% of
German civilian buildings resulting in the killing of 600,000
civilians when hearing about the gassing of six millions Jews?
The continued existence of the Holocaust taboo, 60 years after the end
of World War II, comes at a terrible price. For one, it makes it
virtually impossible for world opinion to hold Israel responsible for
its treatment of the Palestine people. Any criticism of Israel's
policies is stifled by wholesale claims of Anti-Semitism, implying
that the critic is trying to 'finish off' Hitler's job of
exterminating the Jewish people. This doesn't necessarily occur
intentionally. In many cases it's simply the result of a Holocaust
induced paranoia. For two, it makes it easier for the US government to
continue its use of aerial bombing against civilians as a means of
warfare. The killing of more than 3000-4000 civilians per month in
Iraq pre-dominantly through US air strikes wouldn't be possible
without the belief in US military and political circles that the
killing of civilians in air warfare ('collateral damage') is not a war
crime, a belief that has its roots in the unpunished strategic bombing
of Germany and Japan during World War II.
Historical revisionism is not about denying the truth. It's about
establishing the truth, regardless of the outcome. The failure of the
political left to embrace Holocaust revisionism is depriving it of the
potentially most powerful weapon against its political enemies. It
should stop fighting against its political enemy of 60 years ago and
start using all available means to fight today's battles.
[Andrew Winkler is the Editor/Publisher of The Rebel Media Group. He
can be contacted on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And, finally, in a letter excerpt to me, I share with you a few
thoughts from the man who is credited with starting it all by sending
a forensic team to Auschwitz - and found it not what it purported to
be. Remember also that Ernst is forbidden by the laws of Germany to
refer to the "Holocaust" in any way - except in reverential tones. In
the letter below he simply refers to it obliquely or as "the other
issue":
You had rhetorically asked me in one of your letters why I thought the
way I did - and where that knowledge, the overarching comprehension,
came from. Here's how my "Weltbild" was built - and continues to evolve.
I thought I should close off the old year with this review - and what
a year it was, with me, in effect, being run out of the North American
Continent where I lived and worked for almost half a century! For
what? I wonder how many people reflect on that extraordinary move by
three states - with a fourth the chief beneficiary, in the short term
at least.
In the long term, my case will work itself through the entrails of
world politics. Although publicly my detractors never tired of
informing the world that I did not have enough supporters to fill a
phone booth, behind the scenes, as the [German] court papers reveal,
money and efforts expended prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that the
most influential and well-connected schemers, movers and shakers, who
constitute the real string pullers in world affairs, were concerned
enough to suspend their own rules, to violate their constitutional
provisions in three countries to take out of circulation one lone
artist of pension age! One man against time!
[Think of] the enormous organizational effort it took over decades to
achieve that silencing! I once again appreciated what Francis Parker
Yockey pointed out in his epochal book, "Imperium" - little noticed,
hardly known - that, in this age, the man of politics, the person
working with, or upon, the hearts, minds, and souls of people would be
superior to the man of finance, the military, and the judiciary.
Yockey ought to have known, having been a gifted lawyer, researcher,
and investigator for the Allied War Crimes Commission in Europe. He
investigated and interviewed the "hated", just defeated elite of
Europe. That's how he came to his sensational knowledge and insights,
which he condensed in this sweeping overview of the situation of the
West and its endangered culture.
Francis Parker Yockey suffered a fate very similar to my own, with one
difference: He did not have my knack for getting the news catapulted
into the public arena. He worked away quietly in that monestery in
Ireland, writing his books and appeals, which were noted only by his
enemies, whom he had identified as the real Enemy of Europe.
I was very fortunate to be handed the two volumes of "Imperium" given
to Mr. Arcand, [a nationalist Canadian leader of a Party] by Yockey in
the late '50s when he stayed with Mr. Arcand for long talks, long
walks, and played the most glorious music on Mr. Arcand's piano for
hours.
My teacher was no slouch, Ingrid! Mr. Arcand was for many years the
culture and music editor and critic of La Presse in Montreal. La
Presse was the largest circulation French language newspapar outside
Paris. Life Magazine devoted a large photo-illustrated section to him
because he attracted 5,000 people at La Guardia Airport in New York
during an American speaking [tour] about 1937. The papers referred to
him as the Eagle of the North. Through making available to me his
library, and walking me through history, culture, religion, and
political ideology, he saved me decades of going down dead ends and
false trails. Thank God!
Ingrid, I think that early schooling laid the solid foundations and
supplied the important criteria and filters - the methodology that has
served me ever after. Served me well, as you know!
Mr. Arcand was to me what Socrates was to Plato. He was to me the
proverbial master who appeared because the pupil was ready. I don't
know if Mr. Arcand was even aware of it or if it was just a natural
trait with him. He obviously spotted in me, the young, artistically
inclined peasant boy, a kind of unspoiled talent. We complemented one
another, as odd as it seems at first glance - he, of the
well-educated, aristocratic French-Canadian landed gentry, and I, an
inquisitive young man. It was a magic time for me and left in me a
memory which deeply embedded itself within me. This almost
sleepwalker-like knowledge, soaked up like a sponge, already condensed
in Mr. Arcand's life experience, was stripped by me of the parochial
overtones which clouded it, since Mr. Arcand was naturally a firm
Catholic Conservative believer, as was the Zeitgeist in French-Canada
at the time.
The rest was, of course, organizationally difficult to achieve, the
pursuit was costly, but the outcome was predictable and predestined.
Ingrid, logic - like mathematics or music or medicine - has its very
own rules and laws, as firm and immutable as Newton's laws of gravity.
It is, of course, easy to write this down in this condensed form after
years of reflection and the actual hands-on role I played in bringing
it about. And here comes the karmic/cosmic role of the Enemies of
Truth: Their assaults, attacks, shrill criticism of my activities
kept me focused far more than if they had simply ignored me. But no -
Sabina [Citron, president of the Canadian Holocaust Remembrance
Association] and her coterie of haters saw to it that I had simply no
choice but to increase my efforts, hone my skills, and study,
research, network, ask for advice, contact Dr. Lindsay, Arthur Butz,
Mark Weber, Robert Faurisson - and eventually, in a roundabout way,
Fred Leuchter. Had it not been for [my detractors'] intense ethnic
hatred, had they left me alone, Ingrid, never would I have so
concentrated on the solution to these problems. The trials were the
outcome. The massive publicity, negative or not, put that topic on
the map and into the consciousness of hundreds of millions scattered
all over the world.
Fate and my enemies cast me in the role of this Don Quixote, tilting
at windmills in this macabre bean-counting exercise, which I hated
from the outset. Ingrid, I shied away from this issue for a decade
because I had a far more positive, forward-looking vision of the
world, which could only be realized via the political arena. That's
why that was my decade of learning in the 1960s - of learning the use
of the tools I would need for that life, learning English, French,
testing my speaking skills - and, yes, learning the art of
salesmanship. Salesmanship permeates all of human life - even
courtship is salesmanship, if properly analyzed. So is politics. I
knew that from Day One.
The 1960s were my decade of self-teaching. Mr. Arcand was a one-man
university with a vast storehouse of knowledge. [Over time], I
drifted of necessity into other fields because the Canadians denied me
citizenship, which abruptly slammed the doors shut on what even news
media people had thought was a promising career in the political arena
at the time of my election campaigns. I was content to leave the
other issue to the historians. However, it became evident that these
men of little intellectual courage were not going to come to the
defense of not only my own German people but of Western civilization
as a whole.
I decided that the streets could shame the Ivory Tower dwellers into
dealing with the topic - and proceeded to do just that. At least I
attempted to do it, and won some over with my own research results and
my pin pricks of pointed poking, prodding, cajoling. That part ended
in the trials, which were my way of public education, using the
courtroom as the auditorium for my experts.
It worked. The rest is history.
That's when the administrative harassment started - mail denial,
snooping, customs, postal seizures, passport and travel restrictions!
When that did not stop the dissemination of information, next came
beatings, arrests, bombs and other assassination attempts. The
judicial persecution was only part and parcel of that, but even German
and Canadian courts were then still independent enough to deliver
stunning victories. They made it clear to my enemies that the courts
were not willing to do their bidding so easily.
When the Supreme Court ruled in my favor, my detractors were so
shocked that I had a brief respite. Only afterwards came the mass
demonstrations, the arson, and the parcel bomb.
I survived.
My enemies realized in the decade of the 1980s that I was not the
clown and buffoon - what Alan Borovoy [Jewish Counsel to the Canadian
version of the ACLU] called "...a peripheral non-entity with not
enough support to fill a phone booth." They realized what they had on
their hands was a street-wise, organized peasant who had learned a few
things that the trials had forced upon me - their efforts were not
going to be cake walks. All their deprecating insults heaved upon me
for the last decades were not going to make that debate go away. The
genie was out of the bottle.
That's when they decided to go the legislative route and change the
goal posts by introducing ever more repressive laws. The Human Rights
abuses via their own institutions were meant to finish what the fire
and the bomb had not achieved. Infiltration was also stepped up -
Bristow and the likes arrived.
The rest you know - and you and I had a few years of heaven and
contentment. And then they came for me. In America.
That it would come to that [after that] fateful-for-us [9/11]
September day was clear to me - if not yet to you. The arrest, the
deportation - a camouflaged rendition into the hands of my deadly
enemies - was the beginning of the slamming of the door [for them] as
it was to my political ambitions earlier on. Thanks to the protracted
legal struggle, the hard reality has been temporarily obscured and is
not yet comprehended by the uninitiated in the cabbalistic
machinations of these people.
Machiavelli was a boy scout compared to the millennia of deviousness,
deception, steered corruption and infiltration these people could fall
back on. Remember the study by the U.S. War College published during
the week of those tragic events of September '01? The report was
leaked the Washington insiders' way of alerting the public to problems
and dangers suppressed by the ruling oligarchy. It fingered only one
nation that could initiate something [like 9/11] and then blame it on
others.
--- In [email protected], "woroskcjan006" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> Kita gak tahu isi keseluruhan buku yg menyebabkan
> pengarangnya
> sampai dihukum di Austria. Kalau isinya hanya meragukan
> pembunuhan Yahudi
> dikamar gas, nyatanya sebelum terjadi kasus 'kartun
> nyunggi bom''
> pemimpin Iran membuat pernyataan 'yang meragukan
> pembunuhan masal yahudi
> dijaman Hitler', tidak
> ada yang protes. Memang sih ada pernyataan keprihatinan
> pemimpin dunia ( klu gak salah sekjen PBB ) atas
> pernyataan tsb.
> Pemimpin Iran itu telah memanfaatkan kebebasan berbicara,
> yang kemungkinan
> besar menyakitkan bangsa Yahudi.
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 03:31:16 -0000
> "mangdeden1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sudah hampir sebulan gw sodorin kasus ernst zundel di
> >prol.... Tapi
> > kalo sudah gelap mata, pikiran picik, tebal muka dsb...
> >walo disodorin
> > pembanding pun mereka masih gagap menerima kebenaran....
> > Goblog kan?
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "laut putih"
> ><laut_putih@> wrote:
> >>
> >> hahaha... gw ngakak ngebaca kisah David Irving. Ini
> >>pembelaan scr
> > natural. Tuhan telah mengirimkan pembela....
> >>
> >> Bagaimana para satria pembela Freedom of speech?
> >> Kenape diem?!
> >> Pasti banyak yg terkaing-kaing saat ini...
> >> Udahlah... nyemplung di sumur bor aja...
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Ambon
> >>
> >> Refleksi: Mungkin sengaja penulis arikel Republika
> >>ini tidak
> > mengetahui bahwa penyanghan Holocoust sesuai hukum
> >Austria bisa
> > dihukum penjara 10 tahun. Untuk meringankan hukuman, Dr
> >David Irving
> > mengakui bersalah. Alasan mengapa Austria mempunyai
> >peraturan hukum
> > demikian ialah karena sejarah Austria dalam perang dunia
> >II, dan juga
> > Adolf Hitler berasal dari Austria
> >>
> >> REPUBLIKA
> >>
> >> Rabu, 22 Februari 2006
> >>
> >> David Irving
> >>
> >>
> >> Seberapa kuatkah klaim selama ini bahwa kebebasan
> >>adalah prinsip
> > Barat yang mutlak? Andrew Sullivan, saat meledaknya
> >kasus kartun Nabi
> > Muhammad, menuliskannya untuk Majalah Time.
> >''Prinsip-prinsip Barat
> > sudah jelas. Toleransi? Ya. Keimanan? Mutlak. Kebebasan
> >berekspresi?
> > Tak ada negosiasi,'' tulis sang kolumnis pada
> >pertengahan Januari lalu.
> >> Berpekan-pekan kalimat Sullivan menjadi bahasan panas
> >>dan mendapat
> > pengaminan di jagat maya. Sampai, akhirnya, pekan ini,
> >pengadilan
> > Austria berkata lain. David Irving, sejarawan Inggris,
> >kemarin
> > menerima vonis tiga tahun penjara atas ''dosa'' yang ia
> >perbuat 17
> > tahun lalu. Ia saat itu menulis buku Hitler's War yang
> >isinya
> > meragukan terjadinya pembantaian terhadap Yahudi pada
> >era Nazi. Ia,
> > antara lain, tak menemukan fakta adanya kamar gas untuk
> >pembunuhan
> > massal.
> >>
> >> Apa kabar kebebasan berekspresi?
> >> Omong kosong. Austria mengharamkan karya ilmiah
> >>Irving. Pandangan
> > kritisnya divonis sebagai Antisemit, sebuah ''dosa'' tak
> >terampunkan
> > di negeri itu, walau hanya sebentuk wacana dan pemikiran
> >dalam buku.
> > Dan, di Eropa, ada 10 negara lain yang menganut asas
> >hukum tersebut.
> >>
> >> Kita jadi teringat kasus kartun Nabi. Sikap Eropa
> >>mengeras setelah
> > menyaksikan rintihan Muslim yang terlecehkan di seluruh
> >dunia. Perdana
> > Menteri Denmark tak sudi meminta maaf. Para pemimpin
> >negara-negara
> > Eropa membelanya. Anggota parlemen Italia dengan
> >provokatif memasang
> > salinan kartun Rasul di kaus oblong.
> >>
> >> Di mana toleransi? Tidak ada.
> >> Kita tak ingin situasi seperti ini berlanjut. Kita,
> >>sebagaimana
> > PBB berulang mengimbau, berharap ada penyelesaian nyata
> >dan damai
> > untuk masalah kartun. Ini adalah persoalan amat besar
> >dunia dan kita
> > tak ingin Barat dan Islam diperhadapkan hanya untuk
> >sebuah kekacauan.
> >>
> >> Kita tentu tak bahagia melihat korban berjatuhan dalam
> >>aksi-aksi
> > mengecam Jyllands-Posten di Afghanistan. Kita pun tak
> >berharap kedubes
> > negara-negara Barat menjadi sasaran perusakan di Timur
> >Tengah. Kita
> > juga tak melihat manfaat lomba kartun mengolok-olok
> >Holocaust di Iran.
> >>
> >> Tapi, kita memang harus mengingatkan bahwa kita hidup
> >>setara
> > dengan mereka. Kita harus memberi tahu bahwa dunia
> >adalah milik
> > bersama tanpa kesemena-menaan definisi dari pihak
> >manapun. Akan ada
> > yang terluka saat kebebasan dalam definisi sebuah
> >peradaban menikam
> > yang lainnya.
> >>
> >> Dunia haruslah buah dari dialog terus-menerus, bukan
> >>pengangkangan
> > satu atas lainnya. Barat--yang terwakili oleh Eropa,
> >Amerika Serikat,
> > dan kadang-kadang Australia--sama derajatnya dengan
> >Timur. Dalam
> > istilah kita, ''Berdiri sama tinggi, duduk sama
> >rendah.'' Kisah arogan
> > The West dan The Rest harus ditutup. Tak ada terra
> >nullius yang harus
> > ditaklukkan.
> >>
> >> Kasus Irving, andai mau kita jadikan pelajaran, adalah
> >>contoh
> > bahwa kebebasan yang menikam pihak lain sebenarnya tak
> >bermakna
> > apa-apa. Seharusnya, pelajaran ini pula yang kita sembua
> >bisa ambil
> > dalam kasus kartun Nabi, juga kasus novel Salman Rushdi,
> >film Theo van
> > Gogh, dan lainnya. Dengan demikian, tak ada lagi standar
> >ganda.
> >>
> >> Kita selama ini amat merasakan standar ganda itu. Kita
> >>cukup
> > khawatir peristiwa yang terus berulang akan membuat kita
> >cenderung
> > terbiasa. Namun, satu hal yang tak boleh berhenti adalah
> >tindakan kita
> > untuk mengingatkan.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subscribe : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Unsubscribe : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > List owner : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
========================================================================================
> Ikuti Lomba Puisi Online Jawa Timur, dapatkan hadiah menarik setiap
bulannya
> dan hadiah total senilai 60 juta rupiah
> hanya di http://www.plasa.com (Khusus Jawa Timur)
>
========================================================================================
>
Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
