http://www.facebook.com/notes.php?id=631783883&notes_tab=app_2347471856#%21/note.php?note_id=485139024399



Soeharto & Franco - A Lesson from Spain
by Aboeprijadi Santoso on Saturday, October 30, 2010 at 10:42am


A tribute to a friend, Asmara Nababan (died Oct. 28, 2010).

" .. the hope to achieve justice for the millions of victims of human rights 
violations in Indonesia remains to be remote. Victimization of the victims 
continues." (Asmara Nababan, 2009)


Two weeks on, the controversy on whether or not former President Soeharto 
should be awarded the title of 'national hero', has continued unabated. It 
reflects the depth of the influence and vested interests he had built during 
his reign versus the strong public resistance against these.







The issue would not have arisen had there been some sorts of tribunal or truth 
commissions to reveal his role and responsibilities on the political and 
humanitarian disasters that occurred during his dictatorship.

The experience of post-war Europe, in particular public discourses on fascist 
dictatorships in Spain, could serve an important lesson.

Angel Salamanca and Luis Royo are Spain's national icons. Salamanca fought on 
the side of Gen. Franco in Spain's civil war (1936-39) and subsequently joined 
Hitler's war against Soviet Union. Royo is the exact opposite: a protagonist of 
Spain's anti-fascism, he fought against Franco and, in France, against Hitler.

Seventy years later, in Sept. 2004, the socialist government of PM J.L. 
Rodriguez Zapatero invited both at a national parade "to honor all citizens who 
had fought for their principles and values". However, Franco victims felt 
"dishonored" and many conservatives feared "disgrace". The parade was boycotted 
and democratic Spain (since 1975) failed to start reconciliation. Old wounds 
thus remain.

But Spain is, of course, a unique case in Europe where authoritarian regime 
continued to prevail after the WW-II until thirty-six years later.


The Guernica (Picaso's reflection of Spain's civil war)

Elsewhere in Europe, postwar-transitions have stabilized democratic 
institutions and the overall consensus is that war crimes should neither be 
forgotten nor forgiven. Put simply, a general public acknowledgment and 
acceptability have been shaped about 'good' and 'evil', the 'good' and the 'bad 
boys', which are recognized by those in 'grey' category.

These processes were painful and traumatic, but they did resolve national 
schism and nurtured national cohesion by legitimizing the blame through war 
tribunals, condemning fascism -- being the anti-thesis of democracy -- 
precisely in order to strengthen democratic values - most remarkably in Germany 
where fascism took roots.

It is this choice that basically constituted Europe's post-war political-moral 
paradigm. Spain, too, embraced it, but since Franco regime survived the civil 
war and fascism continued well after the WW-II, it's generally more complicated 
to overcome fascist legacy, build up democratic institutions, and educate the 
public accordingly.       

Another consequence is that while West Europe was able to resolve its past 
burdens by founding war tribunals and processes of public education, Spain has 
to rely mainly on the latter.

It's true, war-tribunals in Nuremberg and Tokyo, in addition to numerous local 
court proceedings for perpetrators and collaborators, inevitably implied 
'victor justice'. However, they had powerful effect of public educative 
campaign: over decades they thus contributed toward the institutionalization of 
democratic values through mass media, seminars, government's and civil society 
democracy trainings, school curricula, museums etc.

Some countries, notably (East) Germany and the Baltic, faced a double legacy -- 
the Nazi Holocaust and the Soviet dictatorship -- such that made their attempts 
to overcome their burdens more complicated.

But, this aside, countries burdened by bitter civil wars and conflicts like 
Spain and Indonesia badly need transitional justice through tribunals and truth 
commission and reconciliation.

Differences between the two dictators seem obvious, but let's focus on their 
similarities to highlight democratic transition. 



  
Franco and Soeharto had a few parallels. Both came to power rather abnormally 
(Franco's plain coup 1936, Soeharto's creeping coup 1966); ruled three decades 
long; inherited a deep-seated schism, internal political and ideological 
conflicts; and victimized at least 500.000 people in the resulting civil war 
and massacre (Spain in the 1930s, Indonesia in the 1960s). No wonder, the 
impacts of their rule lasted longer than their regimes. 
Indeed, rumors have it, that there had been 'secret deals' in both cases. A 
so-called "1975 unwritten promise" said if pro-Franco forces relinquished power 
after his death (1975), no one would be tried or pursued for past abuses. In 
Soeharto case (May 1998) he actually prepared military chief Gen. Wiranto as 
his successor, but when Soeharto's successor, B.J. Habibie, proposed a 
referendum on East Timor (1999), Wiranto might have used Soeharto's "mandate" 
to ensure that his officers won't be blamed for the aggression and abuses.

In any case, like Spain until recently, past abuses under Soeharto were swept 
under the carpet including those where Soeharto himself, in his biography, 
acknowledged his order to eliminate hundreds of urban thugs (gali-gali) in the 
early 1980s.

Worse, Soeharto had been implicated in greater crimes, including the 1965-66 
bloody episode, the aggression and brutal occupation of East Timor, and 
atrocities elsewhere. The fact that his apologetic successors chose impunity, 
established 'truth' concerning the 1999 violence only, and with it, buried 
decades of East Timor tragedy - all these are comments on Soeharto's 
influential legacy; hence, also his political-moral trademark.

Alas, you can only bent iron while it's hot: not surprisingly, Indonesia's long 
overdue truth commission failed to materialize (2006) as great momentum since 
the power transition in 1998 have been lost. Possibly, a new truth commission 
may be just too little too late.

Spain, meanwhile, has made remarkable progress in which the state condemned the 
dictator and denounced his crimes. It was also involved in projects to uncover 
Franco's mass graves. By contrast, reburial of Soeharto victims, critical 
re-reading of New Order's official history, film making and the like have to be 
initiated from the society and often met local resistance and book burnings.

In Germany, they have the Holocaust monument, but we haven't contemplated a 
monument for Pulau Buru (Indonesia's Gulach) where the nation could learn her 
tragic episodes from. Today, 65 years on, they finally have their first Hitler 
exposition in Berlin, which has been widely praised as 'fair' without 
triggering public hysteria.

Spain and Germany have thus come to terms with their difficult pasts by making 
Gen. Franco and Hitler their historically 'negative symbols': acknowledging, 
that is, their historic role, nonetheless pointing to their negative impacts 
for the nation's values.

In Indonesia - quite the contrary - mainstream politicians are still pondering 
about making Soeharto a hero. Shame to the nation, and a humiliation to our new 
democracy. A long and uneasy transition.

Soeharto, therefore, should be treated the same way as Franco and Hitler. Only 
then, perhaps, we can put Soeharto hero issue aside once and for all, and learn 
more, and more fairly, from our own 'Royos' and 'Salamancas'.



ends








[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke