***Gaddafi masih hidup atau sudah mati, berdasarkan berita dari media massa.
***Kenyataan membuktikan bangsa Indonesia tidak bisa diatur AS dan NATO. Setelah lengser, bangsa Indonesia tidak mengganggu keamanan Pak Harto... --- In [email protected], Harry Adinegara <sans_culotte_30@...> wrote: > > > > > ----- Forwarded Message ----- > > > Ada dua pokok pandang perihal berita meninggalnya diktator Gaddafi, dipandang > dari sudut politis bisa dikatakan setiap diktator yang kemudian dalam > kariernya sudah habis waktu gunanya bagi pihak Barat akan dipercepat di > habisi . Dilihat seorang diktator sebagai , individu yang  kurang mawas > diri (apa ada ya  diktator yang mawas diri?) dan terlalu rakus harta dan > lamanya diktator nangkring akan membawa musibah bagi diri sendiri. > > Contohnya banyak, yang kita alami sendiri Mbah Harto yang terlalu lama > nangkring dan rakusnya mboten ....mboten > Setelah perang dingin usai, mbah Harto yang dulunya didukung dan dipelihara > oleh imperialis US, tahun 1998 adalah se-olah2 sepertinya use-by-date-nya > sudah tiba, dari itu rakyat Indonesia di-"perbolehkan" oleh imperialis Barat > untuk menggulung Mbah Harto. > > Kapan ya tiran2 di TimTeng terutama Saudi Arabia akan mengalami nasib, > menghadapi use-by-date-nya akan berachir? Negara ini masih bisa di-"pakai" > oleh imperialis Amerika selama tanah ini masih menghasilkan minyak. Padahal > negara ini adalah negara tirani yang paling kejam.Yemen sudah mulai mendekati > keruntuhan-nya ingin melepas diri dari cengkraman tiran Abdulah Saleh, > kemudian menyusul Syria dan mungkin Jordania.. > > Dari semua diktator yang ditumbangkan rupanya hanya Mbah Harto yang bisa > dibilang masih untung, Tapi bagaimanapun juga reputasinya, harga dirinya > sudah terpuruk sewaktu Mbah Harto di panggil oleh Pengadilan sebagai terdakwa > dalam hal korupsi. Mbah Harto adalah bak Tuhan, orang mau mati atau hidup > adalah keputusan-nya. > >  > US and NATO murder Muammar Gaddafi > By Bill Van Auken > 21 October 2011 > The savage killing Thursday of deposed Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi served > to underscore the criminal character of the war that has been prosecuted by > the US and NATO over the past eight months. > The assassination follows NATOâs more than month-long siege of Sirte, the > Libyan coastal city that was Gaddafiâs hometown and a center of his > support. The assault on this city of 100,000 left virtually every building > smashed, with untold numbers of civilians dead, wounded and stricken by > disease, as they were deprived of food, water, medical care and other basic > necessities. > Gaddafi was apparently traveling in a convoy of vehicles attempting to break > out of the siege after the last bastion of resistance had fallen to the > NATO-backed ârebelsâ. NATO warplanes attacked the convoy at 8:30 a.m. > Thursday morning, leaving a number of vehicles in flames and preventing it > from moving forward. Then the armed anti-Gaddafi militias moved in for the > kill. > The death of Gaddafi appears to have been part of a larger massacre that has > reportedly claimed the lives of a number of his top aides, loyalist fighters > and his two sons, Moâtassim and Saif al-Islam. > While details of the killings remain somewhat clouded, photographs and cell > phone videos released by the NATO-backed ârebelsâ clearly show a wounded > Gaddafi struggling with his captors and shouting as he is dragged onto the > back of a vehicle. His stripped and lifeless body is then shown, drenched in > blood. It seems clear that having first been wounded, perhaps in the NATO air > strikes, the former Libyan ruler was captured alive and then summarily > executed. One photograph shows him with a bullet hole in the head. > Gaddafiâs body was then taken west to the city of Misrata, where it was > reportedly dragged through the streets before being deposited in a mosque. > The fate of the body is politically significant in that it was seized by a > Misrata militia faction that is operating under its own command and has no > loyalty to the Benghazi-based National Transitional Council (NTC), which > Washington and NATO have anointed as the âsole legitimate representativeâ > of the Libyan people. > Thus this grisly event, which President Barack Obama hailed in the White > House Rose Garden Thursday as the advent of âa new and democratic Libya,â > in reality only exposes the regional and tribal fault lines that are setting > the stage for a protracted period of civil war. > Both the US and France claimed credit for their roles in the murder of > Gaddafi. The Pentagon asserted on Thursday that a US Predator drone had fired > a Hellfire missile at the ousted Libyan leaderâs convoy, while Franceâs > defense minister said that French warplanes had bombed it. > The US and NATO had carried out repeated air strikes on Gaddafiâs compounds > in Tripoli and other homes where they suspected he was hiding since shortly > after the brutal air war against Libya was launched last March. One of these > strikes at the end of last April claimed the lives of his youngest son and > three young grandchildren. > Washington had deployed surveillance planes along with large numbers of > drones in an attempt to track down Gaddafi, while US, British and French > intelligence agents, special operations troops and military âcontractorsâ > operating on the ground also participated in this manhunt. > Just two days before the murder of Gaddafi, US Secretary of State Hillary > Clinton staged an unannounced visit to Tripoli on a heavily armed military > aircraft. While there, she issued a demand that Gaddafi be brought in âdead > or aliveâ. > As the Associated Press reported, Clinton declared âin unusually blunt > terms that the United States would like to see former dictator Muammar > Gaddafi dead. > ââWe hope he can be captured or killed soon so that you donât have to > fear him any longerâ, Clinton told students and others at a town hall-style > gathering in the capital city.â > The AP went on to note: âUntil now, the US has generally avoided saying > that Gaddafi should be killed.â > Yet in reality, Washington is pursuing an unconcealed policy of state murder. > In this case, it has openly advocated and provided every resource to > facilitate the killing of a head of state with whom the US government had > established close political and commercial relations over the course of the > last eight years. > The battered corpse of Gaddafiâs son Moâtassim, who was also captured > alive and then executed, was put on display in Misrata. As recently as April > 2009 he was warmly welcomed to the US State Department by Hillary Clinton. > In his Rose Garden speech Thursday, Obama boasted of his administration > having âtaken outâ Al Qaeda leaders, sounding for the all world like a > Mafia don, minus the charm. Among his most recent victims are two US > citizens, Anwar Awlaki, the Arizona-born Yemeni-American Muslim cleric, last > month and, two weeks later, his 16-year-old son Abdulrahman, who was born in > Denver. Both had been placed on a âkill listâ by a secret National > Security Council subcommittee and murdered with Hellfire missiles. > Abdulrahman was blown to bits along with his 17-year-old cousin and seven > other friends as they ate dinner. > The killing of Gaddafi is the culmination of a criminal war that killed > untold numbers of Libyans and left most of the country in ruins. This > operation was launched on the pretext of protecting civilian lives, based on > the trumped up claim that Gaddafi was preparing to lay siege to the eastern > city of Benghazi to massacre his opponents. It has ended with NATO > orchestrating a siege of Sirte, where thousands have been killed and wounded > in suppressing opposition to the ârebelsâ. > From the beginning, the entire operation has been directed at the > re-colonization of North Africa and pursued on behalf of US, British, French, > Italian and Dutch oil interests. > While over the past decade Gaddafi had curried favor with US, Britain, France > and other Western powers, striking oil deals, arms agreements and other > pacts, US imperialism and its counterparts in Europe continued to see his > regime as an impediment to their aims in the region. > Among the principal concerns in Washington, London and Paris were the > increasing Chinese and Russian economic interests in Libya and more generally > Africa as a whole. China had developed $6.6 billion in bilateral trade, > mainly in oil, while some 30,000 Chinese workers were employed in a wide > range of infrastructure projects. Russia, meanwhile, had developed extensive > oil deals, billions of dollars in arms sales and a $3 billion project to link > Sirte and Benghazi by rail. There were also discussions on providing the > Russian navy with a Mediterranean port near Benghazi. > Gaddafi had provoked the ire of the government of Nicolas Sarkozy in France > with his hostility to its scheme for creating a Mediterranean Union, aimed at > refurbishing French influence in the countryâs former colonies and beyond. > Moreover, major US and Western European energy conglomerates increasingly > chafed at what they saw as tough contract terms demanded by the Gaddafi > government, as well as the threat that the Russian oil company Gazprom would > be given a big stake in the exploitation of the countryâs reserves. > Combined with these economic and geo-strategic motives were political > factors. The turn by Gaddafi toward closer relations to the West had allowed > Washington and Paris to cultivate elements within his regime who were > prepared to collaborate in an imperialist takeover of the country. This > includes figures like Mustafa Abdul Jalil, Gaddafiâs former Justice > Minister and now chairman of the NATO-backed NTC and Mahmoud Jibril, the > former economics official who is chief of the NTC cabinet. > With the popular upheavals in Tunisia and Egyptâ"on Libyaâs western and > eastern bordersâ"the US and its NATO allies saw an opportunity to put into > operation a plan that had been developed over some time for regime change in > Libya. With agents on the ground, they moved to exploit and hijack > anti-Gaddafi demonstrations and foment an armed conflict. > To prepare for a direct imperialist takeover, they followed a well-worn path, > vilifying the countryâs leader and promoting the idea that only outside > intervention could save innocent civilians from a looming massacre. > The supposed imminent destruction of Benghazi was utilized to win support for > imperialist war from a whole range of ex-lefts, liberals, academics and human > rights advocates, who lent their moral and intellectual weight to an exercise > in imperialist aggression and murder. > Figures like University of Michigan Middle Eastern history professor Juan > Cole, who had raised limited criticism of the Bush administrationâs > invasion of Iraq, became enthusiastic promoters of the âhumanitarianâ > mission of the Pentagon and NATO in Libya. Representative of an upper middle > class social layer that has become a new constituency for imperialism, they > were utterly compromised, politically and morally. They were untroubled by > the lawlessness of the entire enterprise and the mounting evidence of the > murder and torture of immigrants and black Libyans by the so-called rebels. > Their attempt to portray the regime change in Libya as a popular revolution > becomes more preposterous with each passing day. The unstable puppet regime > that is taking shape in Benghazi and Tripoli has been installed through > relentless and massive NATO bombing, murder and the wholesale violation of > international law. > Libya stands as a warning to the world. Any regime that gets in the way of US > interests, runs afoul of the major corporations or fails to do the bidding of > the NATO powers can be overthrown by military force, with its leaders > murdered. > Already, the US media, which has staged a hideous celebration of the > bloodbath outside Sirte, is braying for NATO to repeat its Libyan > intervention in Syria. For her part, Clinton warned Pakistani leaders on > Thursday that insufficient support for the US-war in Afghanistan would mean > that they would pay âa very big price.â > There can be no doubt that future operations are on the way, with bigger wars > coming into focus, posing catastrophic consequences. The Obama administration > has already put Iran on notice that all options remain âon the tableâ in > relation to a fabricated plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in > Washington. And as the Libyan intervention was aimed in no small part at > countering Chinese and Russian influence both in the region and globally, so > China and Russia themselves are seen as future targets. > The bloody events in Libya, and the economic motives underlying them, are > providing a fresh lesson in the real character of imperialism. The crisis > gripping world capitalism is once again posing the threat of world war. The > working class can confront this threat only by mobilizing its independent > political strength and rearming itself with the program of world socialist > revolution to put an end to the profit system, which is the source of > militarism > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ------------------------------------ Post message: [email protected] Subscribe : [email protected] Unsubscribe : [email protected] List owner : [email protected] Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
