On 31.01.21 17:32, Ben Kochie wrote: > Another option is we could fully build our own busybox binary, with the > necessary fixes. > > I'm somewhat in favor of going distroless. With a large number of users > using our container images in Kubernetes, it's less necessary to include > busybox, as they can attach userspace sidecar containers.
I guess distroless would also simplify the question of how to include all required licenses, simply by requiring a whole lot less of them. -- Björn Rabenstein [PGP-ID] 0x851C3DA17D748D03 [email] [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/20210201140259.GE3906%40jahnn.
