+1 for distroless. On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 3:03 PM Bjoern Rabenstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 31.01.21 17:32, Ben Kochie wrote: > > Another option is we could fully build our own busybox binary, with the > > necessary fixes. > > > > I'm somewhat in favor of going distroless. With a large number of users > > using our container images in Kubernetes, it's less necessary to include > > busybox, as they can attach userspace sidecar containers. > > I guess distroless would also simplify the question of how to include > all required licenses, simply by requiring a whole lot less of them. > > -- > Björn Rabenstein > [PGP-ID] 0x851C3DA17D748D03 > [email] [email protected] > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Prometheus Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/20210201140259.GE3906%40jahnn > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CA%2BT6YoyjUG-Gh6QyFhTCYW-8wZ-wud3HqGc1mn7W8cm3ojQmcw%40mail.gmail.com.
