Sorry if I am wrong, but won't the transaction based remote-write solve this issue?
On Wednesday, February 17, 2021 at 12:13:25 AM UTC+5:30 [email protected] wrote: > Hi! > > I've recently observed that the tolerance to a Remote Write outage is > variable. The amount of lost data depends on the volume of existing data in > WAL segments, which WAL segment is currently being tailed by Remote Write, > and how much time remains before the next WAL checkpoint is created. > > I've written a proposal to try to address this and make tolerance to an > outage more predictable. Feedback > would be appreciated: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DcaHoWZnA-N5UlQ7sJ0IlPKe4ul2nimWlzWaZSxPkNU/edit# > > I plan to contribute the changes for this myself. > > Best, > Robert > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/dfda8dd0-210b-4a80-b487-31bebb39ea74n%40googlegroups.com.
