I'm not familiar with transaction based remote-write, can you point me at where work on that is happening?
On Wednesday, February 17, 2021 at 2:27:46 AM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote: > Sorry if I am wrong, but won't the transaction based remote-write solve > this issue? > > On Wednesday, February 17, 2021 at 12:13:25 AM UTC+5:30 > [email protected] wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I've recently observed that the tolerance to a Remote Write outage is >> variable. The amount of lost data depends on the volume of existing data in >> WAL segments, which WAL segment is currently being tailed by Remote Write, >> and how much time remains before the next WAL checkpoint is created. >> >> I've written a proposal to try to address this and make tolerance to an >> outage more predictable. Feedback >> would be appreciated: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DcaHoWZnA-N5UlQ7sJ0IlPKe4ul2nimWlzWaZSxPkNU/edit# >> >> I plan to contribute the changes for this myself. >> >> Best, >> Robert >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/79b0345e-1b47-4b3b-b1cd-ffc41e7c763en%40googlegroups.com.
