>>>>> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Hendrik Tews wrote: > Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> writes: > Byte-compilation of ProofGeneral fails if Emacs was configured with > option --without-x, because image-load-path is not defined in this > case:
> Which emacs version are you using? > Could anybody explain me, why I cannot reproduce the problem? I > tried with emacs23-nox from Debian, which has image.el not loaded > and where (boundp 'image-load-path) gives nil. Nevertheless, > emacs --batch --no-site-file -q -eval '(setq load-path (append (mapcar > (lambda (d) (concat "/tmp/ProofGeneral-4.1/" (symbol-name d))) (quote (acl2 > ccc coq hol98 isar lego pgshell phox generic lib))) load-path))' -eval > '(progn (require (quote bytecomp)) (require (quote mouse)) (require (quote > tool-bar)) (require (quote fontset)) (setq byte-compile-warnings (remove > (quote cl-functions) (remove (quote noruntime) byte-compile-warning-types))) > (setq byte-compile-error-on-warn t))' -f batch-byte-compile > generic/proof-toolbar.el > runs without error on proof-toolbar.el version 11.1 Right, compilation succeeds here with app-editors/emacs-23.4-r3 but fails with app-editors/emacs-24.1 (both packages built with USE="-X"). Looks like the byte compiler of Emacs 24 is stricter. Ulrich _______________________________________________ ProofGeneral-devel mailing list ProofGeneral-devel@inf.ed.ac.uk http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/proofgeneral-devel
