Of course not two minutes later I try the contact page and it's working.
(They could still ad mailto tags)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:46 AM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: RE: [PEDA] SV: Hard Look at other Programms
> 
> 
> Yes the site is pretty unprofessional. It's a bad first impression. 
> 
> The contacts link is invalid: http://www.pulsonix.com/contacts.htm
> The ordering page has an email addr, but they couldn't even 
> bother to include a mailto tag to make it easy to contact 
> them.  http://www.pulsonix.com/ordering.htm
> 
> How much is it? Who knows...
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Craig Elison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 7:14 AM
> > To: Protel EDA Forum
> > Subject: Re: [PEDA] SV: Hard Look at other Programms
> > 
> > 
> > You say these people are very serious about their product.
> > I'm not sure.  I found their web site the 20th of February.  
> > They were offering a free schematic capture.  I downloaded it 
> > and sent in an email to get the key.  I never got it back.  
> > Even after several emails.  Your comments interested me. I'm 
> > ready to dump Protel 99SE and I will not got to DXP.  So I 
> > hit their site this morning after I saw your reply.
> > 
> > First thing is see is they ended the free schematic in March.
> >  Still waiting for the key requested in Feb!  Price is a big 
> > factor for me so the next thing I looked for was their 
> > pricing.  I went to the sales link.  No pricing I could find. 
> >  I went to "More Information".  Using their site index for 
> > "Prices", "Trade-in Prices" and "Upgrade Prices" got "Page 
> > Not Found" errors.  I'll keep an eye on them, but I'm not 
> > going to even try their demo if I don't know the pricing 
> > before hand.  I could fall in love with it and then find I 
> > can't afford it.  I also would have wasted my time evaluating 
> > the demo.  I also didn't find any info on tech support.  Do 
> > they have phone support?  They are in the UK, but I see they 
> > have a rep or two in the states.
> > 
> > 
> > A unhappy Protel user
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peder K. Hellegaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 8:20 AM
> > To: Protel EDA Forum
> > Subject: [PEDA] SV: Hard Look at other Programms
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Do yourself a favour:
> > 
> > Take a look at the relative new tool called PULSONIX
> > (www.pulsonix.com)
> > 
> > Those guys are very serious and the package is low priced but
> > with very good functionality and not to forget: Very stable.
> > 
> > In addition, if a user finds a bug (it is software though)
> > and reports it, it is usually fixed within a few hours (and 
> > this is the fact) and the user receives the updated files. 
> > This is the customer care you always has been looking for.
> > 
> > The Pulsonix EDA tool imports design files AND library files
> > from a lot of other EDA tools, and this also works perfectly.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >From a former Protel VAR
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> > Fra: Michael Reagan (EDSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sendt: 4. september 2002 14:48
> > Til: Protel EDA Forum
> > Emne: [PEDA] Hard Look at other Programms
> > 
> > 
> >     Dennis and Waldemar wrote
> > 
> > >here is one more guy who want to know what you will find 
> out looking
> > >for
> > other EDA Software.
> > The Programs I found where either very expensive (unpayable 
> for me) <
> > 
> > 
> > Here is what I have found so far:
> > 
> > Orcad PCB:  users satisfied with Orcad until Cadence
> > purchased Orcad . OrCad PCB may have licensed routing code 
> > and "other" code from Protel and vice versa, The interfaces 
> > are very similar.  Also similar in functionality and price, 
> > and features.  Protel 99SE has an edge with more layers, 
> > generally more capability.  Both are in the same price range. 
> >  Both are good capable programs.  Cadence has not done much 
> > to improve ORCAD layout since
> > purchasing it.   Don't look for good support from Orcad 
> > unless you plan to
> > drop Orcad layout and upgrade to Cadence tools.   Orcad also 
> > shares the same
> > buggy autorouter, but the Orcad users I talked to don't know 
> > the difference. Maybe Orcad debugged their router.  If you 
> > want to make OrCad work properly, you need Spectra.
> > 
> > 
> > PADS/INOVEDA/now MENTOR:   Lets face it this is DOS code 
> > dressed up to look
> > like a windows program  the same approach that Acad did with
> > their programs. It is fairly stable.  Commands are awkward, 
> > looks like it was designed by Unix programmers.  While 
> > awkward and limited,  it is still a good program.
> > I have seen droves, herds, packs, groups, and all    of PADS 
> > users switch to
> > Cadence in the past year.   Maybe they made a mistake and 
> should have
> > switched to MENTOR.     To get a real working setup of "PADs" 
> > be ready to
> > spend some money.   I doubt if you can seriously do any PCB 
> > work (equal to
> > 99SE) for under 30K.      Their new router is fair,   lets 
> > face it Spectra
> > is still king of the hill.    I don't know what MENTOR was 
> > thinking buying
> > this Product from  Inoveda.  They were going out of business 
> > anyway, so why
> > pay for any money for them.    (Sounds like the Accel deal)   
> >  PADS offers
> > less features at a higher price than MENTORs EXPEDITON did, 
> > I'm  not sure how Mentor plans to sell a program with less 
> > features at a higher price. ( did I repeat myself,  sounds 
> > like the Accel deal again)
> > 
> > 
> > MENTOR EXPEDITION:  Guys and Gals   This is the real McCoy of 
> > Software.
> > This is the program everybody but me should be using, This is
> > the yardstick
> > that all tools should be measured to.   So why cant I use it 
> > ?     Be cause
> > I cant import a netlist into it.  That is a major hurdle for 
> > design bureaus, since we get netlist different sch packages . 
> > If your design is in house,
> > both schematics and  pcb.  There is no better tool.   OK you 
> > say you cant
> > afford it?  36K with all the bells and whistles.  Don't look 
> > at how much the tool cost but how much you will save when 
> > things are working the way they
> > should.  This tool will actually save you money     This is VERIBEST
> > software, which I saw several years ago,   it was good then 
> > and it is better
> > now.  I have not seen anything better , period.
> > 
> > 
> > INTERCEPT:   I just spent a few minutes on the phone 
> > yesterday with the rep.
> > BUZZZZZZZZZZ  drop them to the gator trap!  They use Spectra
> > for routing.
> > OK Spectra is good.   If you couple Spectra with Protel,  you 
> > can probably
> > do a board as good as any piece of software out there  except 
> > the MENTOR stuff.
> > 
> > Cadence:   See INTERCEPTcomments with Spectra.   Same old 
> > trick another day
> > with Spectra.  Lets face it if Cadence didn't purchase this
> > software they would have folded years ago.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > **************************************************************
> > **********
> > * Tracking #: 0ABD3E4F9E846144B1FEDB6FB5C7FD604A086EB2
> > *
> > **************************************************************
> > **********
> > 
> > 
> 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to