VIENNA, Austria - A recent House of Representatives committee report on Iran's 
nuclear capability is "outrageous and dishonest" in trying to make a case that 
Tehran's program is geared toward making weapons, a senior official of the U.N. 
nuclear watchdog has said. 
  The letter, obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday outside a 35-nation 
board meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency, says the report is 
false in saying Iran is making weapons-grade uranium at an experimental 
enrichment site, when it has in fact produced material only in small quantities 
that is far below the level that can be used in nuclear arms.
  The letter, which was first reported on by The Washington Post, also says the 
report erroneously says that IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei removed a senior 
nuclear inspector from the team investigating Iran's nuclear program "for 
concluding that the purpose of Iran's nuclear program is to construct weapons."
  In fact, the inspector was sidelined on Tehran's request, and the Islamic 
republic had a right to ask for a replacement under agreements that govern all 
states relationships with the agency, said the letter, calling the report's 
version "incorrect and misleading."
  "In addition," says the letter, "the report contains an outrageous and 
dishonest suggestion that such removal might have been for 'not having adhered 
to an unstated IAEA policy barring IAEA officials from telling the whole truth 
about the Iranian nuclear program.'"
  Dated Aug. 12, the letter was addressed to Rep. Peter Hoekstra, chairman of 
the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. It was signed by Vilmos 
Cserveny, a senior director of the Vienna-based agency.
  An IAEA official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not 
authorized to comment on the letter, said it was written "to set the record 
  Jamal Ware, a spokesman for the House committee, confirmed they had received 
the letter and said the chairman had referred it to Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., 
and Rep. Rush Hold, D-N.J. They will review it and issue a formal response if 
necessary, he said.
  "All IAEA complains about is a photo caption. If you read the report, it's 
very clear that what it is saying is that Iran is working to develop the 
capability to enrich uranium to weapons grade, not that they have done so," 
Ware said. "They use a string of adjectives, while not pointing to any 
substantive criticism of the report. There are areas where we would disagree 
with them. A disagreement does not make what we say erroneous."
  The dispute was reminiscent of the clashes between the IAEA and Washington 
over whether Saddam Hussein was trying to make weapons of mass destruction, 
including nuclear arms. American arguments that Saddam had such covert arms 
programs were given as the chief reason for invading Iraq and toppling Saddam.
  ElBaradei's criticism of the U.S. standpoint on Iraq and subsequent 
perceptions that he was soft on Iran in his staff's investigation of suspicions 
Tehran's nuclear activities may be a cover for a weapons program led to a 
failed attempt last year by Washington to prevent his re-election.

Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ 
countries) for 2ยข/min or less.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Sageata Albastra e cea mai mare tzeapa a transportului public! 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Raspunde prin e-mail lui