On 8/4/2010 1:35 PM, joel falcou wrote:
> On 04/08/10 01:00, Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Most folks here don't know this, but the version of Proto y'all
>> are using is actually v4. (Three times the charm wasn't true for
>> Proto.) Anyway, there are so many goodies coming in Boost 1.44 that
>> think of it as Proto v4.1.
> Would you like me to write some lines on my compile-time performance
> and figures to include somewhere in the doc. I remember you wanted to
> do that at some point.
IIRC, you use some tricks to bring down compile times, right? I think
that would make a very good section for the docs, yes.
proto mailing list