On Mar 5, 11:47 am, ijuma <isma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I haven't optimised with a profiler very recently - I suspect there > > are some improvements which could be made by skipping the null > > handling when merging/parsing (as it should be unnecessary). I didn't > > use any particular options when running the Java version (1.6.0_11- > > b03) so I'm sure there are tweaks to be made there too. > > Before any other settings are tried, it would be worth benchmarking it > with -server as it can make a large difference when compared to - > client. The default varies based on OS and machine specification so it > makes sense to use an explicit setting to make it clear what JIT was > used.
Right. Somewhat embarrassingly, this laptop doesn't actually *have* the server JIT installed. I'm mostly working on the C# code at the moment, but I'll come back and rerun the test with the server JVM when I've got a bit more time. Jon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
