OK, I'm confused. The "packed" encoding is already supported for repeated integers, floats, etc. Can you clarify some more?
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Marc Gravell <marc.grav...@gmail.com>wrote: > > I'm sorry - I didn't do a good job with the question... > > I meant with things like integer, float, etc... > > With the packed encoding, it *seems* like it would be possible to send > jagged array-like data fairly efficiently. > > I wasn't referring to string/message. > > Marc > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
