Mine (http://code.google.com/p/common-lisp-protobuf/) was essentially
an experiment to train myself in Lisp, and was never a fully
functional implementation. Since I don't have the time currently to
make it into a full implementation, and since s-protobuf appears to be
aiming for completedness, I'm happy for my project to be removed from
the third party page.

As for the other implementation, http://code.google.com/p/cl-protobuf/
, it seems to have had no activity since July 2008, and provides no
source code, so I would suggest that it can also be removed, in the
name of decluttering the Common Lisp protocol buffer offerings.

Neil, if you're interested in the common-lisp-protobuf project name on
Google Code, I'd be happy to reset the project and transfer it to you.

- Dave

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote:
> I've added this to the list of implementations:
>   http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns
> Looks like we have two other Common Lisp implementations already, but
> neither one appears to be maintained.  :/
>
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:31 PM, ntd <mechs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I wanted to announce a Common Lisp protobuf implementation:
>>
>> http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~ndantam3/docs/s-protobuf/
>>
>> Currently it can encode and decode all the basic test cases listed in
>> the protobuf documentation.  It will also read in the binary output of
>> protoc to generate the class and method definitions.  There are still
>> plenty of missing features though, as detailed in the link above.
>>
>> Hopefully someone will find this useful.
>>
>> --
>> Neil
>>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to