Hi, > This is exactly what I've done before putting arrays into a string. > When I've implemented arrays via repeated fields, the program was > even slower, > and the file size was too large (compare to Java serialization > mechanism+ zip).
If you put the values in a string and do you own array management on top as compared to using a repeated field with packed option, there should not be a significant difference because it is essentially the same. Protobufs don't come with a compression, so if you compare the sizes, you need to compare compressed Java serialization with compressed proto serialization. If you provide an example of what you want to do and what are your current solutions you compare, people on this list might be able to help. -h --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
