To be more precise, how do I avoid the inner class implementations in the auto-generated code by protobuf(java). I want the java file name to be same as the Message name which also implies that the message class should not be an inner class. Is there a way to achieve this(In short similar to DAO classes used by ejb or hibernate)?
On Nov 10, 6:32 am, sansun08 <[email protected]> wrote: > I am not asking specific to torque. Were there any successful attempt > in integrating with any of the famous ORMs like hibernate or JPA? > > On Nov 9, 11:03 am, sansun08 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We use <a href="http://db.apache.org/torque/index.html">apache torque</ > > a> as ORM in our project. The DAOs( torque auto generates the DAO > > classes based on the schema design) generated are quite complex( since > > our database schema design is really complex). We use readExternal and > > writeExternal to deserialize /serialize objects. We already face some > > serious performance issues when the data is large. I think protobuf > > can definitely make things better for our case. Is there a way to > > integrate Protobuf classes with our existing DAO model? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
