Add this to your .proto file: option java_multiple_files = true;
Note that the outer class is still generated, it just doesn't contain the other classes. You can still change the outer class name with: option java_outer_classname = "Whatever"; On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM, sansun08 <csshankaravadi...@gmail.com>wrote: > > To be more precise, how do I avoid the inner class implementations in > the auto-generated code by protobuf(java). I want the java file name > to be same as the Message name which also implies that the message > class should not be an inner class. Is there a way to achieve this(In > short similar to DAO classes used by ejb or hibernate)? > > On Nov 10, 6:32 am, sansun08 <csshankaravadi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am not asking specific to torque. Were there any successful attempt > > in integrating with any of the famous ORMs like hibernate or JPA? > > > > On Nov 9, 11:03 am, sansun08 <csshankaravadi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > We use <a href="http://db.apache.org/torque/index.html";>apache > torque</ > > > a> as ORM in our project. The DAOs( torque auto generates the DAO > > > classes based on the schema design) generated are quite complex( since > > > our database schema design is really complex). We use readExternal and > > > writeExternal to deserialize /serialize objects. We already face some > > > serious performance issues when the data is large. I think protobuf > > > can definitely make things better for our case. Is there a way to > > > integrate Protobuf classes with our existing DAO model? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
