Cheers all; some useful input. Before I get too excited, I'll run some quick tests and simply compare writing as group vs string with my current code (since I can flip between them trivially and groups don't involve any shuffling).
Marc On Mar 10, 10:26 pm, Evan Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Kenton Varda wrote: > > With Protocol Buffers, we already say that fields can appear in any > > order, so any security mechanism built around matching the raw bytes of > > a protobuf message against some blacklist is obviously flawed. > > Ah, I was not aware of that. Good to know. > > Evan > > -- > Evan Joneshttp://evanjones.ca/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
