Cheers all; some useful input.
Before I get too excited, I'll run some quick tests and simply compare
writing as group vs string with my current code (since I can flip
between them trivially and groups don't involve any shuffling).
On Mar 10, 10:26 pm, Evan Jones <ev...@mit.edu> wrote:
> Kenton Varda wrote:
> > With Protocol Buffers, we already say that fields can appear in any
> > order, so any security mechanism built around matching the raw bytes of
> > a protobuf message against some blacklist is obviously flawed.
> Ah, I was not aware of that. Good to know.
> Evan Joneshttp://evanjones.ca/
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at