On Apr 27, 2010, at 15:04 , Kenton Varda wrote:
The "optimizations" mentioned in the changelog are CPU speed or memory usage optimizations, not encoded size optimizations.
Totally unrelated, but this reminds me that I think there may still be one optimization possible with Java protocol buffers and strings. I'll try to spend some time revisiting this at some point "soon."
Evan -- Evan Jones http://evanjones.ca/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
