On Apr 27, 2010, at 15:04 , Kenton Varda wrote:
The "optimizations" mentioned in the changelog are CPU speed or memory usage optimizations, not encoded size optimizations.


Totally unrelated, but this reminds me that I think there may still be one optimization possible with Java protocol buffers and strings. I'll try to spend some time revisiting this at some point "soon."

Evan

--
Evan Jones
http://evanjones.ca/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol 
Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.

Reply via email to