If any dependency needs to be build beforehand, then how is topological ordering is supported?
On 7/21/2010 17:39 Jason Hsueh writes: > Ordering is important because any dependencies need to be built before they > are used - if you give an arbitrary order there may be errors complaining > about undefined symbols or imports not being found. A depth first ordering > will work, and that's exactly what protoc does when producing > FileDescriptorSet now. The change you were alluding to was released in > 2.3.0. > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Nader Salehi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I was wondering if there was a "correct" way of building a set > > containing multiple files with dependency(ies). Looking at the old > > archives, I know Kenton has mentioned the next set of protoc (when?) > > will output FileDescriptorSet in topological order, but would any > > other order work equally the same? Would a Depth First approach of > > adding files and their dependencies do? > > > > Cheers, > > Nader > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Protocol Buffers" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<protobuf%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
