Comment #4 on issue 263 by moofis...@gmail.com: Proto parser for Java http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=263
Kenton or other Google team members: What are your current thoughts on this enhancement? Are you in favor of the SWIG'd solution, thought about it and decided to stick to your original no Java Parser stance, creating the Java Parser would add to much maintenance and up keep going forward?
Also what is the reason when I read the readme.txt files that dll's are not encouraged?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
