+1 ...we just got Access is Denied after checkout on someones window 
machine.  An ant task that doesn't call protoc.exe would be great (ie. the 
ant task should just run in java so it's protable without these issues that 
we are running into).

thanks,
Dean

On Tuesday, July 8, 2008 4:40:39 PM UTC-6, anjanBacchu wrote:
>
> " It sounds like 
> better ant support would be a good thing to add as well. " 
> +1 
>
> On Jul 7, 6:11 pm, "Kenton Varda" <tempo...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > For now, just use an <exec> task.  I think something like this works: 
> > 
> > <exec executable="protoc"> 
> >   <arg value="--java_out=outdir" /> 
> >   <arg value="--proto_path=srcdir" /> 
> >   <arg value="srcdir/path/to/input.proto" /> 
> > </exec> 
> > 
> > There are plans in the works for a Maven plugin for this.  It sounds 
> like 
> > better ant support would be a good thing to add as well. 
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Robin Barooah <robi...@gmail.com> 
> wrote: 
> > 
> > > I don't see an ANT task in the distribution.  What's the preferred way 
> > > of running protoc in a java project, or am I missing something?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/protobuf/-/IsdpUSm5rYAJ.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.

Reply via email to