I'm interested in this capability and think it would provide value add. 
Particularly when a team needs to interface something like OSGi based 
services on a backend server with GWT front end.  If you have protobuf as 
the serialization method on your back end currently this feature would 
allow a quicker integration to GWT.  Before spending too much time on 
this, is this something that is high enough on the priority list that it 
can be incorporated into the official Protobuf code base or will it remain 
community maintained? 
 
TIA
 

On Thursday, November 1, 2012 4:32:34 PM UTC-7, [email protected] 
wrote:

> Status: New 
> Owner: [email protected] 
> Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium 
>
> New issue 431 by [email protected]: GWT-compatible Protocol Buffers 
> compiler 
> http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=431 
>
> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2649 
> This feature request on the GWT issue tracker was temporarily put on hold 
>   
> more than a year ago. The protobuf issue tracker might possibly be better 
>   
> suited, so I opened the issue here. 
>
> Protocol buffers are even more important today than they were when this   
> feature was first proposed (back in 2008). Google started work on this   
> feature in 2010, but put it on hold in October 2011. It would be great if 
>   
> the Protobuf Team could pick up where the GWT Team left off,  or perhaps   
> both teams could complete it together. 
>
> Our research group just received a grant from Google AppEngine Education   
> Awards, and we are very interested in having this feature. GWT-compatible 
>   
> protocol buffers would significantly advance several of our research   
> projects. 
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/protobuf/-/Zdi_xdjnAaMJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.

Reply via email to