It is reflected, it just cannot find that message for some odd reason....
On Friday, October 25, 2013 12:38:19 PM UTC-7, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>
> Well, fundamentally, it should all work fine. So you're doing
> something wrong. Your best bet for getting further help would be
> supplying a full repro, i.e. the full proto spec + data being parsed.
> The fact that it says 9 {} and not details {} means that it doesn't
> seem to know about the details field at all. Try changing "test = 1"
> to "testasdf = 1" and see if that is reflected in the output...
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Jesse Carter
> <jc48...@gmail.com<javascript:>>
> wrote:
> > Please anyone? :s I really can't understand what's wrong...
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > "Protocol Buffers" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an
> > email to protobuf+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> > To post to this group, send email to prot...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>.
>
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
