On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Chris Large <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi folks, > > I'm exploring the new javanano-out option available from the repository > since I have some big issues right now with the side of the generated java > code for the protobuf messages. > > My question is, is the wire format affected by the options you use in the > protoc compiler? For example, if I have a server that uses full blown > proto definitions (built with --java_out) but I have a limited client where > I want to use --javanano_out will they interoperate? I'm assuming that the > format on the wire is not affected and the two will talk just fine but > wanted to be sure and didn't have an easy way to test this. > AFAIK --javanano_out uses protobuf wire format and a client using javanano can be used to communicate with a server using the regular java version. Note that --javanano_out is not part of the official protobuf library. You may want to check its documentation to find out whether it's compatible of the official Java implementation. > > Thanks. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
