On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Mikhail Nikonov <
[email protected]> wrote:

> First of all, thanks for the great work; I've been using protobufs for a
> while, and it's good to see them evolving.
>
> One question - if map field is internally emulated by repeated field type,
> is it packed (e.g. [packed=true]) by default, and is there a way to pack it?
>
No. Only repeated primitive fields can be packed but map fields are
represented as repeated message fields on the wire.


> As a related question, was there a thought about making repeated fields
> packed by default, now that .proto language is changing in
> backward-incompatible manner?
>
Yes, we decided to make repeated primitive fields always packed in proto3.
It will be updated soon.


>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Protocol Buffers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to