On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Sreejith M <sreej1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi , > > I searched for a while to see if this query is answered before. But > unfortunately its not been asked before. If i am changing an existing field > say an int to a repeated int. And lets assume i already have old data. If > we read the old data back. Would the (read) repeated field have a size of 1 > Yes, you will get a repeated field with 1 element. > or is it parsed as per the data. I know ideally it should be such that the > size is 1 for old data. But I did not find any reference with the concrete > proof. > > Thanks. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
