Thanks for the reply. I am not using gRPC. I want to use protobuf to define RPC, but have a separate or customized transport implementation.
On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 4:30:12 PM UTC-8, Feng Xiao wrote: > > Are you using grpc? You can post grpc related questions to > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/grpc-io > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 PM, <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> I notice that when RPC methods are defined in a proto file, they are all >> sync APIs. Is there a way to define async methods? Thanks. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Protocol Buffers" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
