I do agree with you that having documentation committed alongside code is
the right approach.

I propose that we write this documentation in Markdown syntax. That gives
us (or our users) the option of easily generating HTML whilst keeping the
barrier to entry low for authors.

I recognise that Markdown lacks the semantic richness of Docbook (used for
the Qpid Broker), but I believe that's ok in this case since our
documentation should be quite short (or we're doing something wrong).

Phil
On Feb 25, 2013 7:07 PM, "Rajith Attapattu" <rajit...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm strong believer in maintaining our docs in the source tree, as it
> makes it easy to release docs along side the code.
> Also it helps keep the docs current.
> The wiki based documentation in the past had many issues, the chief
> complaint being stale most of the time.
>
> We could look at doing something similar to the qpid docs, or we could
> also use this opportunity to experiment with a different approach/tool
> set.
>
> Rajith
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Michael Goulish <mgoul...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I think I will be landing it in the code tree first, and
> > from there, I don't know.   Any suggestions?
> >
> > In the code -- I assume it should be at the top level?
> > i.e. a sibling of the README file?   i.e.
> >
> >
> >      qpid-proton-0.4/pulitzer_prize_winning_documentation
> >
> >
> > or something along those lines?
> >
> > Agree?  Disagree?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Phil Harvey" <p...@philharveyonline.com>
> > To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 12:14:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: [documentation] -- Intro to Proton
> >
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Maybe you didn't see my previous question (or maybe I didn't see your
> > answer).
> >
> > Where are you intending to store this documentation?  Similarly, where
> are
> > you intending to publish it, e.g. as HTML and/or PDF on our web site, as
> a
> > wiki page etc?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Phil
> >
> >
> > On 25 February 2013 16:15, Michael Goulish <mgoul...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Here's the introduction I'm planning on.
> >>
> >> If anyone has any opinions, I'd be happy to get them --
> >> is there too much detail for a quick intro?  Too
> >> little?  A crucial bit I left out?  Something I got wrong?
> >>
> >> ##############################################################
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Introduction to Proton
> >> ===============================================
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The Messenger interface is a simple, high-level API that lets
> >> you create point-to-point messaging applications quickly and easily.
> >>
> >> The interface offers four main categories of functionality.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Messenger Operation
> >> -----------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>   There are only a few operations that are not directly concerning
> >>   with message transmission.
> >>
> >>   A messenger can be created, named, and freed.  It can be started
> >>   and stopped, and it can be checked for errors after any operation.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Sending and Receiving
> >> -----------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>   Both sending and receiving happen in two stages, the inner stage
> >>   moving the message between your application and a queue, the
> >>   outer stage transmitting messages between your queues and
> >>   remote messaging nodes.
> >>
> >>   By changing the ratio of transmissions to queue transfers, you
> >>   can optimize your messaging application for message latency or
> >>   for overall throughput.
> >>
> >>   Subscriptions control what sources your messenger can receive
> >>   from, and what sources it can send to.  Your messenger
> >>   subscribes to the sources you want to receive from, while your
> >>   outgoing messages will be received by messengers that have
> >>   subscribed to your outgoing address.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Message Disposition
> >> -----------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>   When you receive messages, you must either accept or reject them.
> >>
> >>   You can either configure your messenger to automatically accept
> >>   all messages that you get, or you can exercise finer control over
> >>   message acceptance and rejection, individually or in groups.
> >>
> >>   Trackers and Windows let you set or check the disposition of
> >>   messages in groups.  Applying the disposition operations to
> >>   groups of messages can improve your system's throughput.
> >>
> >>   When receiving messages, you can create a tracker
> >>   for the most recently received message, and later use that tracker
> >>   to accept or reject all messages up to (and including) that one.
> >>
> >>   When sending messages, you can create a tracker for your most
> >>   recently sent message, and later use it to inquire about the
> >>   remote disposition of all sent messages up to that point.
> >>   If you don't want to let a receiver make you wait forever
> >>   to see what he's going to do, you can set a timeout that will
> >>   control how long he can take making up his mind.
> >>
> >>   By using incoming and outgoing Windows, you can limit the
> >>   number of messages that these operations affect.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Security
> >> -----------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>   The messenger interface allows you to use the Secure Sockets Layer
> >>   by exposing an interface to the OpenSSL library.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to