Phil,

I think it's worth experimenting with an approach that has a low
barrier-to-entry.
Markdown seems very very appealing. Anytime you can get away with
plain text, it's great.

And as Alan mentioned, the source doc itself can be a finished product.
So my +1 for trying this.

Regards,

Rajith

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Phil Harvey <p...@philharveyonline.com> wrote:
> I do agree with you that having documentation committed alongside code is
> the right approach.
>
> I propose that we write this documentation in Markdown syntax. That gives
> us (or our users) the option of easily generating HTML whilst keeping the
> barrier to entry low for authors.
>
> I recognise that Markdown lacks the semantic richness of Docbook (used for
> the Qpid Broker), but I believe that's ok in this case since our
> documentation should be quite short (or we're doing something wrong).
>
> Phil
> On Feb 25, 2013 7:07 PM, "Rajith Attapattu" <rajit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm strong believer in maintaining our docs in the source tree, as it
>> makes it easy to release docs along side the code.
>> Also it helps keep the docs current.
>> The wiki based documentation in the past had many issues, the chief
>> complaint being stale most of the time.
>>
>> We could look at doing something similar to the qpid docs, or we could
>> also use this opportunity to experiment with a different approach/tool
>> set.
>>
>> Rajith
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Michael Goulish <mgoul...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I think I will be landing it in the code tree first, and
>> > from there, I don't know.   Any suggestions?
>> >
>> > In the code -- I assume it should be at the top level?
>> > i.e. a sibling of the README file?   i.e.
>> >
>> >
>> >      qpid-proton-0.4/pulitzer_prize_winning_documentation
>> >
>> >
>> > or something along those lines?
>> >
>> > Agree?  Disagree?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Phil Harvey" <p...@philharveyonline.com>
>> > To: proton@qpid.apache.org
>> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 12:14:00 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [documentation] -- Intro to Proton
>> >
>> > Hi Michael,
>> >
>> > Maybe you didn't see my previous question (or maybe I didn't see your
>> > answer).
>> >
>> > Where are you intending to store this documentation?  Similarly, where
>> are
>> > you intending to publish it, e.g. as HTML and/or PDF on our web site, as
>> a
>> > wiki page etc?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Phil
>> >
>> >
>> > On 25 February 2013 16:15, Michael Goulish <mgoul...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Here's the introduction I'm planning on.
>> >>
>> >> If anyone has any opinions, I'd be happy to get them --
>> >> is there too much detail for a quick intro?  Too
>> >> little?  A crucial bit I left out?  Something I got wrong?
>> >>
>> >> ##############################################################
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Introduction to Proton
>> >> ===============================================
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> The Messenger interface is a simple, high-level API that lets
>> >> you create point-to-point messaging applications quickly and easily.
>> >>
>> >> The interface offers four main categories of functionality.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Messenger Operation
>> >> -----------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >>   There are only a few operations that are not directly concerning
>> >>   with message transmission.
>> >>
>> >>   A messenger can be created, named, and freed.  It can be started
>> >>   and stopped, and it can be checked for errors after any operation.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Sending and Receiving
>> >> -----------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >>   Both sending and receiving happen in two stages, the inner stage
>> >>   moving the message between your application and a queue, the
>> >>   outer stage transmitting messages between your queues and
>> >>   remote messaging nodes.
>> >>
>> >>   By changing the ratio of transmissions to queue transfers, you
>> >>   can optimize your messaging application for message latency or
>> >>   for overall throughput.
>> >>
>> >>   Subscriptions control what sources your messenger can receive
>> >>   from, and what sources it can send to.  Your messenger
>> >>   subscribes to the sources you want to receive from, while your
>> >>   outgoing messages will be received by messengers that have
>> >>   subscribed to your outgoing address.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Message Disposition
>> >> -----------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >>   When you receive messages, you must either accept or reject them.
>> >>
>> >>   You can either configure your messenger to automatically accept
>> >>   all messages that you get, or you can exercise finer control over
>> >>   message acceptance and rejection, individually or in groups.
>> >>
>> >>   Trackers and Windows let you set or check the disposition of
>> >>   messages in groups.  Applying the disposition operations to
>> >>   groups of messages can improve your system's throughput.
>> >>
>> >>   When receiving messages, you can create a tracker
>> >>   for the most recently received message, and later use that tracker
>> >>   to accept or reject all messages up to (and including) that one.
>> >>
>> >>   When sending messages, you can create a tracker for your most
>> >>   recently sent message, and later use it to inquire about the
>> >>   remote disposition of all sent messages up to that point.
>> >>   If you don't want to let a receiver make you wait forever
>> >>   to see what he's going to do, you can set a timeout that will
>> >>   control how long he can take making up his mind.
>> >>
>> >>   By using incoming and outgoing Windows, you can limit the
>> >>   number of messages that these operations affect.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Security
>> >> -----------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >>   The messenger interface allows you to use the Secure Sockets Layer
>> >>   by exposing an interface to the OpenSSL library.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>

Reply via email to