Correct: 'I don't think ProtonJ and ProtonC should reside in the proton-api.jar'
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Rajith Attapattu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So, I'd be in favour of Hiram's proposal if ProtonJ and ProtonC reside in >> proton-api.jar. This would be very easy to do, e.g. >> >> > I don't think ProtonJ and ProtonC should reside in the proton-api.jar > And I don't think thats what Hiram suggested either (pls correct me if I > have misunderstood). > > Only the Proton interface and supported interfaces needs to be there in > proton-api.jar. > ProtonJ, ProtonC, or any other implementation will be in the respective > implementation jars. > > Apart from testing, I doubt most people will want to switch between > implementations the way we have them now. > For most it would be an informed decision of choosing a particular > implementation after weighing the pros and cons of it. > > Rajith -- Hiram Chirino Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
