Right, I wasn't suggesting the proton codebase use Java 8 anytime soon (I would think not until Java 7 is EOLed), just that if a Java 8 codebase uses proton-j then the idioms will be a little bit closer to each other.
--Rafael On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Clebert Suconic <csuco...@redhat.com>wrote: > The only issue is that all the users using Proton-j would have to be at > least Java8. > For instance, I can have maybe my users using Java8 on the server, but > they won't migrate all their clients. > > > On Apr 30, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Rafael Schloming <r...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > > I forgot to mention, but another part of the reasoning here is that Java > 8 > > is (finally!!!) allowing static methods in interfaces, so the "natural" > > pattern for this sort of thing would just be Interface.create(...), and > > while we won't be able to use that for a while, the > > Interface.Factory.create(...) option is about as idiomatically close to > > that as we can get in Java 7. > > > > --Rafael > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Rafael Schloming <r...@alum.mit.edu> > wrote: > > > >> Hi Everyone, > >> > >> I've put together a patch that makes the proton-j factory usage a bit > >> simpler and more consistent. You can review it here if you like: > >> > >> - https://reviews.apache.org/r/20854/ > >> > >> The main point of the patch is to make all the factories consistently > >> follow this pattern: > >> > >> package.Interface iface = package.Interface.Factory.create(...); > >> > >> I like this because it is simple and easy to remember and doesn't > require > >> importing the impl packages directly. > >> > >> The patch preserves the convenience constructors, e.g. > Proton.connection() > >> and so forth, but it does remove the old factory APIs. I think this is a > >> reasonable thing to do because the old factories were cumbersome enough > to > >> use that I don't think anyone actually bothered (including our own > >> exmaples). > >> > >> In any case, please shout if this patch will be troublesome for you. If > I > >> don't hear anything I'll go ahead and commit it later this week. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> --Rafael > >> > >> > >