----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gordon Sim" <g...@redhat.com>
> To: us...@qpid.apache.org
> Cc: proton@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 2:30:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Proposed SASL changes (API and functional)
> On 02/24/2015 08:48 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> > In a short while when people have had enough time to absorb the proposal
> > and comment I will post a code review of the actual code changes. As
> > there are substantial API changes I'd like to get this in for 0.9
> > because we were intending to stabilise the API at this point.
> To me it seems a bit late in the cycle for 0.9 for changes of this
> magnitude and I'd prefer to see it included during 0.10 with any
> accompanying changes to ssl.

+1 to that.  While I like where these API changes are headed, I don't think we 
should hold 0.9 up.  I'd prefer cutting 0.9 without these changes.  Put the API 
changes on trunk once 0.9 is out and give us some more time to 'kick the tires'.


Reply via email to