On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:44:41AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Darryl L. Pierce <dpie...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 05:45:20AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > > > Can you post an isolated reproducer with just your definition of > > pn_rbkey_t > > > and a code version of the 5 steps that lead to the seg fault? > > > > On my PROTON-781-reactive-ruby-apis branch is an example named > > "$REPO/examples/ruby/registry_test.rb" which does it. It's very pared > > down, only > > creating 3 Transport instances and consistently produces the segfault. > > > > That branch has about a 15 thousand line delta from master. That's a lot of > lines of code to hide a subtle memory bug. The pn_rbkey_t definition and > enough ruby code to use it in a proof of concept should only require a few > hundred line delta from master. I suggest producing just this delta for two > reasons. 1) Just the act of producing it will help narrow down where the > bug is, and 2) it gives me a much smaller delta to look at so I can be more > useful to you. > > (I did run the registry_test.rb that you pointed to through a debugger, > however its not obvious what the issue is upon inspection of the trace, and > while the ruby.i delta is pretty self contained, the details of how you are > using it from ruby are somewhere buried in the 15K diff.)
I've pulled the pertinent pieces into a new branch: http://github.com/mcpierce/Proton/tree/rbkey-isolation The changes are all here: http://github.com/mcpierce/Proton/commit/2dc770992a7c02fe2054a4a77325a199e39b9c94 and it blows up exactly as I've been experiencing. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
pgppsp4k7wEmA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
