On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 19:56 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 06/09/2015 07:47 PM, aconway wrote: > > C++ standard library uses lowercase_and_underscores, but Qpid C++ > > projects to date use JavaWobbleCaseIndentifiers. Is the C++ binding > > the > > time to start writing C++ like C++ programmers? Or will somebody's > > head > > explode if class names start with a lower case letter? > > > > In particular since the proton C library is written in typical > > c_style_with_underscores, I am finding the CamelCase in the C++ > > binding > > to be an ugly clash. > > I agree and I would go with underscores (and I'm largely responsible > for > the poor choice in qpid-cpp, sorry!). >
Woo-hoo! From the horses mouth ;) Anyone know a good C++ de-camelcasing script?
