On 18 August 2015 at 07:48, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 17/08/15 21:57 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>> On 17 August 2015 at 21:11, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Is that something we can change in qpid-proton ?
>> I'm entirely on board personally with including the extra digit all
>> the time (and actually using it to do more regular point releases;
>> when I did 0.9.1 that was really the first time any of the components
>> have ever had one). I have been using x.y.z format versions for the
>> JMS client releases from the start for precisely the reasons you
>> covered, so a thumbs up from me.
> Sounds great to me. I'd assume it's not "fixable" for 0.10, is it?
No, 0.10 has sailed at this point. We could do a 0.10.1 though.
> If it can be done for 0.10, I'd be happy to see it happening.
> Otherwise, I guess we should just keep it in mind for 0.11.
If enough folks agree we should change to 0.11.0 on master sooner
rather than later, then we can ask infra to clean up the mess we will
have made (again) in the snapshots repo.
> Flavio Percoco