Okay, I don't object to a respin to pick this up. If anyone else does, speak up. Alan, please line up a reviewer to comment on PROTON-949.
Take notice! Last call: I'm going to spin for RC 2 tomorrow and start the vote shortly after. If you are aware of any problems, speak now. Thanks, Justin On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:59 AM, aconway <acon...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 22:15 -0500, Justin Ross wrote: > > Hi, all. The RC is now available here: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.11.0-rc/ > > > > Maven staging repo: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-10 > > 48/ > > > > I will be away from my keyboard for the remainder of this week. On > > Monday, > > the 9th, I will start the release vote if no blockers have been > > discovered > > in the interim. > > > > Thank you very much to everyone who tested the alpha and beta. If > > you've > > not yet taken a look, please test the RC and report your results. > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-949 is not in the RC. It > is not a regression but it is a *very* perplexing build failure with a > very low risk fix, IMO we should get it in there. > > Not only is it very hard to figure out why it won't build, but when you > finally fix the problem by removing the ccache swig binary, it > magically comes back when swig happens to get auto-updated by > yum/dnf/whatever and you waste more time scratching your head again. I > have done this more than once. I probably shouldn't admit that but I'm > sure I'm not the only one. > > Cheers, > Alan >
