Something came up at work, so I'm delaying RC 2 to tomorrow morning. On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Justin Ross <justin.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, I don't object to a respin to pick this up. If anyone else does, > speak up. Alan, please line up a reviewer to comment on PROTON-949. > > Take notice! Last call: I'm going to spin for RC 2 tomorrow and start the > vote shortly after. If you are aware of any problems, speak now. > > Thanks, > Justin > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:59 AM, aconway <acon...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 22:15 -0500, Justin Ross wrote: >> > Hi, all. The RC is now available here: >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.11.0-rc/ >> > >> > Maven staging repo: >> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-10 >> > 48/ >> > >> > I will be away from my keyboard for the remainder of this week. On >> > Monday, >> > the 9th, I will start the release vote if no blockers have been >> > discovered >> > in the interim. >> > >> > Thank you very much to everyone who tested the alpha and beta. If >> > you've >> > not yet taken a look, please test the RC and report your results. >> > >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-949 is not in the RC. It >> is not a regression but it is a *very* perplexing build failure with a >> very low risk fix, IMO we should get it in there. >> >> Not only is it very hard to figure out why it won't build, but when you >> finally fix the problem by removing the ccache swig binary, it >> magically comes back when swig happens to get auto-updated by >> yum/dnf/whatever and you waste more time scratching your head again. I >> have done this more than once. I probably shouldn't admit that but I'm >> sure I'm not the only one. >> >> Cheers, >> Alan >> > >
