Can I suggest a more basic change of simply removing the release version from the Appveyor job id?
None of the other CI jobs have that, and given it has been wrong for around 5 months it doesn't seem particularly noted by most folks. The branch name could still be there as it is now, which in many cases would convey a similar level of information. Robbie On 18 January 2016 at 19:57, Andrew Stitcher <astitc...@redhat.com> wrote: > A small request for the release manager: > > could you please add updating the appveyor.yml file to the correct > version to the release process. > > I've just noticed that the appveyor build still thinks the build > version is 0.10-SNAPSHOT. This strongly implies that the master > appveyor.yml has not been updated in 2 releases. > > This is not terrible, but it is a bit confusing when you go to the > appveyor website and see status of our builds. > > [I've update master to 0.12-SNAPSHOT now, but the beta branch will need > updating to 0.12 and the master branch to 0.13-SNAPSHOT or whatever we > call the next release of proton] > > Thanks > > Andrew > > On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 17:21 -0800, Justin Ross wrote: >> Hello, everyone. It's time for the Proton 0.12.0 alpha. >> >> Revision: 576f656b on master >> Artifacts: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.12.0-alpha/ >> Test output: >> http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-releases/quirk-proton-0.12.0-alp >> ha.log >> >> See the release page[1] for more information about the schedule and >> criteria for accepting changes. >> >> We branch for release in *one week*. Start your testing early. >> >> Thanks! >> Justin >> >> --- >> [1] Proton 0.12.0 release page: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/Qpid+Proton+0.12.0 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org >
