I support making that change. It's now on my site update todo list. On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Alan Conway <acon...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 18:23 +0000, Troy Daniels wrote: > > This was also the only mailing list that I found a reference to when > > I was > > looking at the proton site. Which makes me agree that you (or at > > least > > the documentation) are trying to recruit developers rather than > > users. :-) > > It is a historical accident I think. The Qpid project has a lot of > interesting and inter-related things going on around AMQP. Proton is an > important sub-project but not the only one. In the early days it was > felt by some that proton really needed its own list, but I think in > practice that has turned out to be a bad idea that just isolates and > breaks up discussions. The user list is not so heavily trafficked and > most interesting discussions that touch on proton also touch on other > Qpid projects. So I generally post to the user list but I keep an eye > on this one. > > I'd change the reference on the site if I wasn't afeared of a > firestorm. Anyone who objects please complain on the proton list only > ;) >
