Mislav Marohnić a écrit : > +1 from me Excellent :-)
> Regarding visibility: I don't think you should check for CSS visibility; > I would only check for type=hidden or "disabled" properties. That seems > enough. I certainly agree. > Christophe, I believe the speed reduction of the method would be > insignificant? Absolutely. We're talking <1ms here, I mean, we're working on a subset of the fields in a single form anyway... Plus, when we get Andrew's $$ booster in, I can always use that if necessary to filter using XPath. -- Christophe Porteneuve a.k.a. TDD "[They] did not know it was impossible, so they did it." --Mark Twain Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
