Sure enough. I can live with telling people to get a real browser and having all IE6 requests getting the non-compressed version. No problem with that. :)
Anyway, in most situations, just using the libs as-is and providing proper content expiration works fine enough. The gzipping is just the icing on the bandwidth cake. Best, Thomas Am 21.02.2007 um 21:53 schrieb Tom Gregory: > > That's only half of a proper question. Any answer has to be viewed in > the context of the full question: > > Does anyone have states of the affected share __for some target > audience__. Google has a different audience than MSN, Yahoo, or AOL. > (I'll stereotype and suggest a higher proportion of technical users > use Google, for example.) I worked for a major e-commerce company > ($500M+/yr) that discovered the vast majority of its (profitable) > customers were 30-something college educated women in middle-upper > income households. A rather different dynamic than ThinkGeek. > > So, even if Google were to respond to the question, the answer still > might not apply, and would certainly be less valuable than we might > originally think. The only real way to know is to audit your own logs. > > > TAG > > On Feb 21, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Thomas Fuchs wrote: > >> Should we care for people that haven't installed a years-old hotfix? >> Aren't they going to have a gadzillion security problems anyway? ;) >> >> Anyway, for getting real: does anyone have stats if the affected >> versions still have some appreciable share...? >> >> Best, >> Thomas >> >>> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
