On 6/23/07, Christophe Porteneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't even BELIEVE we still have that in place.  I thought I had fixed
> this ages ago.  We'll have to patch that...

Erm, you sound like it's a hog. In fact, we've benchmarked it vs. a single
regexp and it didn't do so well - that's why is the original 2-pass replace
still in.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to