On 6/23/07, Christophe Porteneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I can't even BELIEVE we still have that in place. I thought I had fixed > this ages ago. We'll have to patch that...
Erm, you sound like it's a hog. In fact, we've benchmarked it vs. a single regexp and it didn't do so well - that's why is the original 2-pass replace still in. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
