Mislav Marohnić a écrit : > Erm, you sound like it's a hog. In fact, we've benchmarked it vs. a > single regexp and it didn't do so well - that's why is the original > 2-pass replace still in.
Really? I had benchmarked the single-regex one on FF1.5 and FF2 and it *was* much faster on large string sets (not necessarily large strings). However, lemme guess... Safari b0rks? ;-) -- Christophe Porteneuve a.k.a. TDD "[They] did not know it was impossible, so they did it." --Mark Twain Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
