Hi Jeff, Wouldn't those methods be a better fit for the Enumerables or Hash ?
Regards, Tobie On Jul 20, 1:04 am, Jeff Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've often found myself using an object literal as a Set and after > wishing I had some real Set operators, I finally found the time to > write them. > > <http://pastie.textmate.org/80530> > > I don't know whether this is core-worthy, but it might be helpful for > someone else out there. > > Just a note, all methods are implemented as statics on the Set > _class_ because I didn't want to pollute the contents of the set. > > The only current limitation is you can't reliably store keys which > already exist in the Object prototype. Of course, I could add a > wrapper object and prefix all the keys to get around this limitation, > but the whole goal of this Set implementation was speed. So extra > method calls aren't desirable. > > -- > Jeff Watkins > UI Engineer, online Apple store --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
