Wouldn't those methods be a better fit for the Enumerables or Hash ?
On Jul 20, 1:04 am, Jeff Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've often found myself using an object literal as a Set and after
> wishing I had some real Set operators, I finally found the time to
> write them.
> I don't know whether this is core-worthy, but it might be helpful for
> someone else out there.
> Just a note, all methods are implemented as statics on the Set
> _class_ because I didn't want to pollute the contents of the set.
> The only current limitation is you can't reliably store keys which
> already exist in the Object prototype. Of course, I could add a
> wrapper object and prefix all the keys to get around this limitation,
> but the whole goal of this Set implementation was speed. So extra
> method calls aren't desirable.
> Jeff Watkins
> UI Engineer, online Apple store
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at