I would definitely second the nomination of a name that actually
means something, like 'setAttribute' or similar. But then I'm a fan
of self documenting function names - even when they're long and
include all the letters in words.
On Aug 15, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Ken Snyder wrote:
>
> Tom Gregory wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> apply: function(iterator, attribute, value) {
>> return this.map(function(item, index) {
>> item[attribute] = value;
>> });
>> },
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
> I've run into a need for this as well. I'd vote for including it
> under
> a name 'setAll' or 'setEach'.
>
> Or, what is the exact opposite of pluck? Pin? Place? Affix? :P
>
> - Ken Snyder
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
