In Opera I was able to perform similar timing with much more
repetitions.
Conclusion: 'init' function is double faster then 'push' function

On Sep 2, 5:16 am, Robert Katić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote small profilehttp://pastie.textmate.org/93190that I paste on
> firebug.
>
> This is results on my laptop:
>
> Size: 100 Times: 10000
> push: 4672ms
> init: 2922ms
>
> Size: 10 Times: 10000
> push: 266ms
> init: 594ms
>
> Size: 4 Times: 10000
> push: 141ms
> init: 79ms
>
> On Sep 2, 4:31 am, Tobie Langel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can we have benchmarks ?
>
> > On Sep 1, 7:32 pm, Robert Katić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I have another question about $A and similar.
>
> > > Why you prefer do this
>
> > >    var results = [];
> > >       for (var i = 0, length = iterable.length; i < length; i++)
> > >         results.push(iterable[i]);
>
> > > instead of
>
> > >    var length = iterable.length, results = new Array(length);
> > >       for (var i = 0; i < length; i++)
> > >         results[i] = iterable[i];
>
> > > It's more faster!


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to