On 10/17/07, Christophe Porteneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This being said, I don't think there's a massive reason to add this
> orthogonal feature to Hash: people who want to use an actual Hash as a
> source object to a template should pass myHash.toObject() instead of
> just myHash...

Surely you don't mean this. Why couldn't I be able to write:


... regardless of whether myData is Object, Hash or some class instance that
responds to "toTemplateElements"?

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to