+1 for what tobie said. I would prefer not to have extra $ method's that do the same thing if possible. Thanks,
Allen Madsen http://www.allenmadsen.com On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 5:32 AM, Tobie Langel <tobie.lan...@gmail.com>wrote: > > A more elegant solution to this problem is to use a closure around the > library, avoid using free variables internally and define an numbers > of exports for external consumption. > > Such changes are planned for Prototype 2.0. > > Hopes this helps. > > Best, > > Tobie > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
